Who Is Eligible To Join the PFAS WATER PROVIDER Settlement?

The Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm focusing representing municipalities and water providers suffering from PFAS water contamination of their drinking water supplyContact Us Now: Claims Deadline is Approaching Soon!

Who Is Eligible To Join the PFAS WATER PROVIDER Settlement?

  1. ALL municipal drinking water providers (Municipalities, Cities, Towns, Counties, Water Authorities serving more than 25 people),
  2. Who have ANY detectible level of PFAS water contamination.

*Phase 1 Qualifying Class Members
** Phase 2 Qualifying Class Members
If your water authority or municipality is found on either one of these lists, you may be eligible to receive significant financial compensation.  Review the information below for details of the settlement between 3M and affected parties regarding PFAS contamination and how much money was involved in the settlement.


In a significant development, German chemical company BASF has reached a $316.5 million settlement with various U.S. public water systems over claims of PFAS contamination. This settlement addresses the environmental and health impacts of “forever chemicals” found in firefighting foams, which have contaminated groundwater at firehouses and airports across the U.S. The funds will aid in remediating perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in affected water supplies, pending approval from a federal judge.

PFAS, used in numerous consumer and commercial products like non-stick pans and stain-resistant fabrics, are linked to cancers and other diseases due to their persistence in the environment and the human body. BASF has stated that the settlement is not an admission of liability and plans to seek reimbursement through its insurance policies.

This settlement is part of a broader legal trend involving PFAS pollution. In 2023, U.S. water systems secured over $11 billion in settlements from major chemical companies, including 3M, Chemours, Corteva, and DuPont. Additionally, Johnson Controls’ subsidiary Tyco Fire Products agreed to a $750 million settlement in April. Claims against BASF, along with several other companies, were scheduled for trial in early 2025, which likely expedited this agreement.

The legal actions highlight the growing recognition of the need for corporate accountability in environmental contamination. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has recently set stringent PFAS limits in drinking water and designated some PFAS as hazardous substances under the Superfund program, emphasizing the increasing regulatory and judicial focus on these chemicals.

This settlement marks a crucial step in addressing the widespread issue of PFAS contamination, demonstrating the extensive efforts required to tackle such a pervasive environmental challenge.


In a pivotal development, Johnson Controls’ subsidiary Tyco Fire Products has reached a preliminary $750 million agreement to settle claims related to PFAS contamination. This settlement, part of the overall PFAS water contamination litigation pursued by our legal team at Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm, represents a significant advancement in addressing the environmental and health impacts of “forever chemicals,” which are found in firefighting foams and numerous household products. The settlement promises compensation for several U.S. public water systems affected by PFAS, pending final approval from U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel.

This agreement is part of a broader trend of legal actions against companies implicated in PFAS pollution. Recently, there have been substantial settlements, including a $10.3 billion agreement by 3M and a $1.19 billion settlement involving Chemours, Corteva, and DuPont, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for corporate accountability in environmental contamination cases. With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency setting stringent PFAS limits in drinking water, this settlement underscores the increasing role of litigation in safeguarding public health and ensuring responsible corporate practices.


A $1.18 billion settlement with DuPont, approved by U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, stands as a significant advancement in the battle against PFAS contamination within America’s public water systems. Announced on February 9, 2024, members of the PFAS Settlement Steering Committee have lauded this decision as a crucial step toward safeguarding the nation’s water quality and public health.

The approval of this settlement initiates a 90-day period during which phase 1 water providers are eligible to submit their claims for a portion of the settlement funds. This phase is critical, as it emphasizes the importance for all phase 1 providers to timely file their claims. A failure to submit a claim within this window would result in water providers losing their legal recourse against DuPont for PFAS contamination in their water supplies. This highlights the urgency and significance of the settlement for affected communities and their right to compensation and remediation efforts.

Time to File a Claim will expire soon, Call Us now at 888-348-2735 to get the process started

In the evolving landscape of environmental litigation, the recent PFAS water contamination settlement on June 22nd, 2023 stands as a watershed moment. 3M Co., a titan in the chemical industry, conceded to a monumental class action settlement of $10.3 billion, with projections potentially touching the $12.5 billion mark, in response to PFAS contamination allegations. As these chemicals, prevalent in myriad daily-use products, infiltrate our water sources, the health repercussions become increasingly concerning.

PFAS Class Action Lawsuit filed by Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm on behalf of the Kent County Water Authority

Example of a PFAS Lawsuit Filed by the Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” persistently linger in the environment, posing grave health risks upon exposure. The significance of this settlement extends beyond financial restitution for contaminated wells and affected communities; it underscores the importance of safeguarding public health and demanding accountability.

For water providers, authorities, and local governments contemplating their stance in the wake of the monumental settlement of this class action lawsuit, Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm emerges as the lighthouse amidst these tumultuous waters. With a stellar reputation, partnerships with some of the nations leading water contamination attorneys, and deep-rooted passion for justice, we provide both comprehensive information about both the Dupont and 3M PFAS class action settlements and unmatched legal representation to those navigating the intricacies of PFAS-related claims for compensation for damages. Dive in with us, as we elucidate the essence of PFAS, the criticality of the legal settlement with 3M and Dupont, and as the legal proceedings wind down we look at long-term solutions for those affected water treatment providers and water authorities now that these claims have settled.

Learn More About Filing a Phase 2 Claim in the Following States:

Breaking News on the Dupont PFAS Class Action Settlement Notice: September 2023

Details of the PFAS Water Provider Settlement Agreement with Dupont and 3M

In a landmark moment of environmental litigation, a comprehensive settlement was reached with chemical industry behemoth, 3M Co., along with other implicated chemical companies and responsible parties. The resolution came after almost a decade of relentless pursuit for justice. The settlement addresses contamination claims surrounding PFAS, the notorious “forever chemicals” found in numerous everyday products.  The goal of the pfaswatersettlement is to help water providers, rate payers, and affected communities pay for the clean-up costs to meet the new regulatory standards for PFAS contamination levels by initiating remediation efforts.  It is hoped that this class action lawsuit settlement agreement can help alleviate public health concerns about PFAS chemicals by bringing together community engagement and government response to lower the long-term effects, environmental impact, and health risks.   For more information about the PFAS water contamination settlement involving 3M and local water authorities, please review the information below which outlines some of the details of the settlement agreement and how it affects water contamination issues.

Eligibility and Financial Distribution:

Municipal water authorities that have detected any trace of PFAS — including PFOA and PFOS — qualify to be a part of this litigation and the subsequent settlement. The majority, in their annual water quality testing, will already have documented these chemicals. Financial gains acquired from this litigation are earmarked for the development and installation of systems to purge the PFAS contamination from the municipal water supply. After the unveiling of the settlement on June 22nd, protocols for the distribution of these funds have been initiated. This settlement will proceed as a conventional class action settlement. All eligible municipal water authorities can expect to receive a notification regarding the proposed class action settlement, alongside an opt-out provision, by year’s end.

The settlement agreement and the proposed class notice lists Phase 1 Qualifying Class Member and Phase 2 Qualifying Class Members.  If your water authority or municipality is found on either one of these lists, you may be eligible to join in the class settlement and receive significant financial compensation.  The essential difference between Phase 1 Members and Phase 2 Members involves whether you have conducted water testing for PFAS chemicals and identified these chemicals, including PFOA and PFOS, prior to the settlement date of June 22nd, 2023.  If you have identified PFAS chemicals in your drinking water supply, you are a “Phase 1” member.  If you have not, you can continue to conduct water testing as well as monitoring and enforcement of State and EPA regulations.  If you later detect PFAS chemicals in your water source you may then be eligible to file a claim in the pfaswatersettlement as a “Phase 2” member.

Timeline and Benefits of Joining:

Choosing to opt into this settlement does not prevent a municipality from sourcing funds elsewhere, such as federal funding or any potential recovery achieved by their State’s Attorney General’s Office through their natural resources claim. The effort required on the part of municipalities has been made as straightforward and hassle-free as possible. Initially, all that’s asked for is the most recent test results and some additional data, to be provided within a span of 90 days post the complaint filing. Anticipated fund disbursement will see 67% of treatment infrastructure funds released by Dupont and 3M in July 2024, while the remaining amount will be dispatched by April 2025. Furthermore, operations and maintenance funds are set to be distributed annually from 2025 to 2033.

Expertise on Your Side:

Our consortium of partner Firms and Attorneys on this matter include some of the nation’s foremost water contamination attorneys. Aligning with our consortium ensures top-tier representation, maximizing your settlement prospects. Our collective acumen, vast knowledge, and resource arsenal are primed to guide you through these intricate proceedings.

Impact of the PFAS Water Provider Settlement

The settlement with 3M regarding the use of PFAS in consumer products and firefighting foams is a monumental move, potentially offering respite to individuals affected by these “forever chemicals.” For the public exposed to PFAS, this settlement signifies recognition of the potential dangers they face, while water providers could obtain funds to purify their water supplies.

However, this decision has faced resistance. A coalition of 23 attorneys general, including Colorado’s Attorney General Phil Weiser, have voiced their objections to the proposed settlement. Weiser is claiming that the settlement fails to sufficiently hold 3M accountable for contaminating America’s drinking water, emphasizing the degraded water quality and public health implications for Coloradans. The objection further claimed that the agreement infringes on states’ rights to regulate pollution and could jeopardize drinking water providers by potentially requiring them to shield 3M from future PFAS-related lawsuits. This underscores the profound concern that the settlement might not adequately serve justice or safeguard the environment and public health.

Environmentally, while the settlement raises awareness about chemical pollutants and fosters clean water initiatives, it simultaneously underscores the profound, long-term challenge of addressing “forever chemicals” in our ecosystem. The nuanced implications of this agreement, especially considering the diverse views of stakeholders and the reservations of various states’ legal entities, reveal its multifaceted impact on public health, the environment, and governance.

FAQ Regarding the Dupont and 3M PFAS Water Provider Settlement

1. What is PFAS?

PFAS, or Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of man-made chemicals used in a range of products from firefighting foam and non-stick cookware to stain-resistant fabrics. Two of the main producers of these chemicals are 3M and Dupont.

2. How does PFAS get into water?

PFAS can contaminate water through various means such as industrial spills, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and the use of firefighting foam in proximity to water sources.

3. What are the health effects of PFAS?

Exposure to PFAS in contaminated drinking water has been linked to health problems including cancer, liver damage, reduced immunity, and potential reproductive issues.

4. What is the PFAS water provider settlement?

The PFAS water provider settlement refers to the agreement reached earlier this year between water providers and those affected by PFAS contamination in their drinking water. It involves significant financial compensation from Dupont and 3M for the affected parties and actions by the water provider to enhance water treatment and monitoring processes.  For more information on PFAS class action lawsuits and settlement options you can visit the South Carolina Federal District Court’s website pfaswatersettlement.com.

5. How do I know if my water is contaminated with PFAS?

Reach out to your local water provider to inquire if they’ve tested for PFAS.  Information on your water providers website and annual water quality report and give you details on the impact of PFAS contamination on water quality as well as steps that have been taken by your water provider to remove these toxic chemicals from groundwater contamination through water treatment processes.  The EPA’s website also lists water systems known to have PFAS contamination and other forms of water pollution.

6. What Water Providers are eligible to join the PFAS water provider settlement?

All drinking water providers, including municipalities, cities, towns, and water authorities whose source water (wells, ground water, surface water) have been tested and indicate detectible levels of PFAS are eligible to join in and receive settlement funds from the PFAS water provider settlement.  The levels of PFAS in your source water do NOT need to be above your local State regulatory limit nor above the proposed EPA limit of 4 ppt.

7. How can I get involved in a PFAS water provider settlement? If you are a water provider who has detectible levels of PFAS (PFOA or PFOS), you need to act now and find a lawyer specializing in PFAS class action settlements..  The time is limited to join in this settlement agreement.  Call the Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm today at 888-348-2735 and speak with one of our experienced PFAS attorneys.

8. Why are state attorneys general opposing the settlement? A coalition of attorneys general from multiple states has raised objections, expressing concerns that the settlement doesn’t hold responsible companies sufficiently accountable and might infringe on states’ rights to regulate pollution.  Some of the concerns involve the fact that the PFAS settlement process does not allow water providers to precisely determine the PFAS settlement amount that they will receive if they decide to opt-into the financial settleemnt.

9. What is the potential impact of this settlement on the environment? While the settlement aims to rectify water contamination and bolster clean water initiatives, the enduring presence of “forever chemicals” in ecosystems highlights the extended challenge of managing such pollutants.

10. What measures are being taken to prevent future contamination? During the PFAS settlement negotiations, the water providers wanted to ensure that any resolution of PFAS litigation would result in PFAS settlement terms that included commitments by water providers to improve water treatment practices, ensuring reduced chances of future PFAS contamination. It also emphasizes awareness and strict regulations around PFAS production and use.


In today’s challenging landscape, where PFAS contamination poses significant threats to both our environment and public health, it’s essential to seek skilled legal guidance. The Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm stands at the forefront of this battle, armed with deep expertise and a fierce commitment to justice. If you are a drinking water provider and you have detectible levels of PFAS in your source water, it is in your best interest to hire a lawyer for a PFAS class action lawsuit and our seasoned team of attorneys is here to champion your rights, and advocate for you to ensure that you receive maximum compensation for your contaminated water. We understand the intricate web of regulations, scientific research, and corporate maneuvers surrounding these toxic chemicals, and we are prepared to provide you with the proper legal advice and legal counsel throughout this suit and take decisive action on your behalf.  Additionally, you do not need to worry about funding this litigation as all legal and lawyer fees are paid on a contingency fee basis and will not become due until you receive compensation at the conclusion of the legal process.

Dedicated legal team - Attorneys Marin, Barrett, and Murphy, providing top rated legal representation in PFAS litigation and water contamination lawsuits.

Moreover, the Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm is proud to collaborate with a consortium of the most experienced water contamination firms in the country. This strategic partnership allows us to pool our collective knowledge, resources, and expertise to tackle PFAS drinking water, waste water and personal injury lawsuits effectively. By combining forces, we strengthen our ability to hold responsible parties accountable for PFAS contamination and secure compensation for our clients.  Joining this litigation by filing a complaint and suing the responsible manufacturers, companies, and firms with with legal representation by some of the nation’s top rated drinking water authority lawyers and attorneys is your best course of action. Now that the 3M PFAS class action lawsuit has been settled, there is limited time for remaining drinking water authorities to file a lawsuit for PFAS contamination.

Manufacturers and polluters have long benefited from the use of these ‘forever chemicals’, often at the expense of unsuspecting communities and individuals. We believe in holding these entities accountable. With a track record of seeking substantial settlements and advocating for regulatory change, the Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm is uniquely positioned to navigate the complexities of PFAS litigation. We are dedicated to pursuing the truth, obtaining fair compensation for victims, and driving systemic change to prevent future harm. Don’t let the weight of battling large corporations like 3M and Dupont deter you; our firm is ready and capable of leveling the playing field. Let us be your steadfast ally in the fight against PFAS contamination and its devastating consequences.