The PFAS Lawsuit Overview

Attorney Matthew Marin - Experienced Legal Representation for PFAS Water Contamination Lawsuits
Contact Us Today for a Free PFAS Claim Evaluation

The PFAS Lawsuit Overview

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have gained significant attention in recent years due to their widespread contamination and potential health risks. As a result, numerous lawsuits have been filed against industries and government entities responsible for the production, use, and disposal of these hazardous chemicals.

The types of lawsuits being filed in relation to PFAS contamination vary, including personal injury claims, property damage claims, and environmental lawsuits. Parties involved in these lawsuits may include individuals who have been exposed to PFAS and experienced adverse health effects, as well as communities and government entities seeking reimbursement for the costs of cleanup and remediation.

However, proving causation and liability in these cases can be challenging, as PFAS contamination is often widespread and can be attributed to multiple sources. Additionally, the complex nature of PFAS chemicals and their long-term effects on human health further complicate the legal process.

Nonetheless, plaintiffs are seeking damages for medical expenses, property devaluation, and loss of enjoyment of property, among other claims. Settlements may be reached through negotiations between the parties involved, or in some cases, the lawsuits may proceed to trial, where a judge or jury will determine the outcome based on the evidence presented.

Overall, the PFAS lawsuit represents a significant legal battle with implications for public health, environmental protection, and corporate accountability.


A $1.18 billion settlement with DuPont, approved by U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel, stands as a significant advancement in the battle against PFAS contamination within America’s public water systems. Announced on February 9, 2024, members of the PFAS Settlement Steering Committee have lauded this decision as a crucial step toward safeguarding the nation’s water quality and public health.

The approval of this settlement initiates a 90-day period during which phase 1 water providers are eligible to submit their claims for a portion of the settlement funds. This phase is critical, as it emphasizes the importance for all phase 1 providers to timely file their claims. A failure to submit a claim within this window would result in water providers losing their legal recourse against DuPont for PFAS contamination in their water supplies. This highlights the urgency and significance of the settlement for affected communities and their right to compensation and remediation efforts.

What Are PFAS?

PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of man-made chemicals that have been widely used in various industries for decades. These substances are resistant to heat, water, and oil, making them ideal for applications such as non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, and firefighting foams.

The claim that PFAS in drinking water can have adverse health effects has gained attention in recent years. Studies have shown that exposure to PFAS can lead to a range of health issues, including liver damage, immune system dysfunction, developmental delays in children, and an increased risk of certain cancers.

PFAS Lawsuit

The litigation surrounding PFAS has gained significant attention due to the scale of the contamination and its potential impact on public health. The lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for their role in the release of PFAS into the environment and the subsequent harm caused to individuals and communities.

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits typically seek financial compensation for medical expenses, property damage, and other related costs. Additionally, government entities are also pursuing legal action to recover the expenses incurred in cleaning up contaminated water sources and implementing remediation measures.

These PFAS lawsuits serve as a reminder of the importance of environmental responsibility and the need for regulations to prevent the harmful effects of chemical substances on public health and the environment.

Types of Lawsuits

With so many people affected by PFAS, there are multiple vehicles of legal recourse in motion, including class action lawsuits and the PFAS exposure lawsuit.

PFAS Class Action Lawsuit

One notable aspect of the PFAS class action lawsuit is the scale of its impact, as it affects a large number of individuals who have been exposed to these harmful chemicals.

The class action lawsuit aims to hold chemical manufacturers accountable for their negligence in allowing PFAS to contaminate the environment and public water systems. Additionally, it seeks to obtain punitive damages from the chemical manufacturers responsible for the production and distribution of PFAS.

Punitive damages are intended to punish the defendants for their actions and serve as a deterrent for future misconduct.

Given the widespread use of PFAS and its persistent nature in the environment, the potential number of individuals affected by this lawsuit is substantial.

PFAS Exposure Lawsuit

The extensive litigation surrounding exposure to PFAS has led to a comprehensive evaluation of the potential health risks posed by these substances and the responsibility of manufacturers in safeguarding public health.

PFAS exposure lawsuits have been filed by individuals and communities who have suffered adverse health effects due to the presence of these hazardous chemicals in their environment. These lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for their role in releasing PFAS into the environment and potentially causing harm to consumers.

The health effects of PFAS exposure have been a major concern in these lawsuits. Studies have linked PFAS exposure to various health problems, including liver damage, kidney cancer, thyroid disease, and developmental issues in children. As a result, individuals who have been exposed to PFAS through contaminated consumer products, contaminated natural resources, or contaminated public water supplies have sought legal recourse to seek compensation for their medical expenses and suffering.

The current PFAS exposure lawsuits have shed light on the health risks associated with these hazardous chemicals and have also prompted manufacturers to take responsibility for their actions and implement measures to prevent further exposure. The litigation has also highlighted the importance of protecting public health and natural resources from the harmful effects of PFAS.

Parties Involved in a PFAS Lawsuit

Various parties, including government agencies, affected communities, and environmental advocacy groups, are involved in PFAS lawsuits.

Corporations that are responsible for the release of PFAS chemicals into the environment are the primary targets of these lawsuits. These corporations are accused of negligence and failure to adequately warn about the health hazards associated with PFAS exposure.

The affected communities, on the other hand, are the victims of PFAS contamination and are seeking justice for the harm caused to their health and property. They file personal injury claims against the corporations, seeking compensation for medical expenses, property damage, and emotional distress.

Government regulators also play a crucial role in PFAS lawsuits. They are responsible for enforcing regulations related to the use and disposal of PFAS chemicals. In some cases, these government agencies have been accused of not taking appropriate action to protect the public from PFAS contamination. Lawsuits may be filed against these agencies for their alleged failure to address the issue effectively.

Additionally, environmental advocacy groups are actively involved in PFAS lawsuits. These groups work to raise awareness about the environmental and health risks associated with PFAS chemicals. They often provide support to affected communities, assist in gathering evidence, and advocate for stricter regulations and consumer protection measures. Through their involvement, these advocacy groups aim to hold corporations and government agencies accountable for their actions regarding PFAS contamination.

Challenges of Remediation

The challenges of remediation in PFAS lawsuits involve various parties, including plaintiffs, defendants, and their attorneys.

Plaintiffs, who are typically individuals or communities affected by PFAS contamination, face the challenge of proving the harm caused by PFAS exposure and seeking compensation for damages.

Defendants, which can be corporations or government entities responsible for the release of PFAS, may face challenges in defending themselves against the allegations and determining the most effective remediation strategies.

Attorneys on both sides play a crucial role in navigating the complex legal landscape, gathering evidence, and advocating for their clients’ interests in these challenging cases. Our team at Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm has experience navigating the complexities and challenges of soil and water contaminant lawsuits. If you’re in need of a lawyer for these matters, contact one of our knowledgeable attorneys today.

PFAS Lawsuit Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs in the PFAS lawsuit demonstrate an array of adverse health effects that have been attributed to exposure to PFAS chemicals. These individuals include both private parties and governmental entities, such as states and municipalities, who have been affected by the contamination of their water systems.

The plaintiffs argue that the release of PFAS chemicals from various sources, including industrial sites and military bases where PFAS-containing firefighting foams were used, has resulted in significant harm to their health and property.

One of the major health effects that plaintiffs attribute to PFAS exposure is ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Studies have shown a correlation between PFAS exposure and an increased risk of developing this condition. Additionally, plaintiffs argue that PFAS chemicals have been found in the blood of affected individuals at levels higher than what is considered safe. This suggests that PFAS chemicals can accumulate in the body and potentially lead to long-term health consequences.

Moreover, plaintiffs argue that the presence of PFAS chemicals in their water systems constitutes a public nuisance and poses a threat to their health and well-being. They claim that the contamination of their drinking water with these hazardous substances has resulted in economic losses, property damage, and a decrease in property values.

By filing the lawsuit, the plaintiffs seek compensation for their losses and demand that responsible parties take action to remediate the contamination and prevent further harm to the affected communities.

PFAS Lawsuit Defendants

Defendants in the PFAS lawsuit encompass a range of entities, including industrial companies and military bases, which are alleged to have released PFAS chemicals into the environment, thereby contributing to the contamination of water systems and the resulting health and property damages.

One of the defendants in the lawsuit is Corteva Inc., a major chemical company that has been accused of knowingly manufacturing and distributing PFAS chemicals. These chemicals have been widely used in various industrial and commercial applications, including the production of non-stick coatings, firefighting foam, and water-repellent fabrics.

Another defendant is Amerex Corporation, a firefighting foam manufacturer. The foam produced by Amerex is alleged to contain PFAS chemicals, which have the potential to contaminate soil and water sources when used in firefighting activities.

BASF Corporation, a global chemical company, is also among the defendants in the PFAS lawsuit. BASF has been accused of manufacturing and distributing PFAS chemicals, which have been found in various consumer products, such as cleaning agents and food packaging materials.

Furthermore, Carrier Fire Security Americas Corporation and Carrier Global Corporation, two entities within the Carrier group, are also defendants in the lawsuit. These companies are accused of manufacturing and distributing PFAS-containing foam used in firefighting activities. The foam, when released into the environment, can seep PFAS into groundwater and contaminate drinking water sources, posing a threat to public health.

The defendants in the PFAS lawsuit represent a diverse group of entities involved in the production, distribution, and use of PFAS chemicals, highlighting the widespread nature of the contamination issue and the potential responsibility of multiple industries in addressing the problem.

PFAS Attorneys

As this litigation revolves around the contamination of public drinking water supplies by harmful chemicals known as PFAS, it is essential to have competent legal representation to navigate the complex legal landscape and advocate for the affected parties.

Skilled attorneys involved in PFAS lawsuits play a crucial role in addressing the environmental risks and potential health impacts associated with these substances. They are tasked with gathering evidence, presenting arguments, and advocating for their clients’ rights and interests.

Our team of attorneys with Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm are experienced in the complexities of water and soil contaminant lawsuits. 

We are prepared to work on behalf of various parties, including individuals and communities that have been affected by PFAS-contaminated water, as well as drinking water providers and public drinking water systems seeking legal remedies. By utilizing our legal expertise and knowledge of environmental laws and regulations, we aim to hold responsible parties accountable for their role in the contamination and seek compensation for the damages caused.

Furthermore, we can work towards ensuring that water standards are adhered to, preventing future contamination, and promoting the well-being of affected individuals and communities.

PFAS Lawsuit Allegations

One of the main allegations in the PFAS lawsuit is that major chemical companies knew about the potential risks associated with these chemicals but failed to disclose them to the public. The lawsuits claim that these companies continued to produce and sell products containing PFAS despite knowing the harmful effects they can have on human health. Studies have linked PFAS exposure to various health issues, including liver damage and birth defects. Additionally, communities have reported cases of illnesses related to PFAS-contaminated water sources.

These allegations have led to a multidistrict litigation, where multiple lawsuits from different plaintiffs are consolidated into one federal court for efficient handling.

The PFAS lawsuit also includes allegations of defective products. Plaintiffs claim that products containing PFAS were not only harmful to human health but also did not perform as promised. For example, water-resistant fabrics that were supposed to repel water failed to do so, leading to property damage and financial losses for consumers.

These allegations highlight the need for increased regulation and accountability in the use of PFAS chemicals to ensure the safety of consumers and the environment. As the PFAS lawsuit continues to unfold, it brings attention to the potential risks associated with these chemicals and calls for stricter regulations and transparency in their use.

PFAS Lawsuit Damages

While one settlement of over $10 billion has been reached, further damages are yet to be doled out to any of the involved parties. There is potential for significant damages as many entities are involved.


The resolution of the legal dispute surrounding PFAS contamination is of great significance for the affected individuals, the environment, and the economy. While one settlement has been reached, more litigation continues.

Several companies, including 3M, Clariant Corporation and Dupont de Nemours Inc., have faced lawsuits over allegations of manufacturing and distributing products that contained PFAS without proper disclosure to consumers. The settlement aims to hold these companies accountable for their actions and provide compensation to those who have suffered health issues as a result of using these products.

In addition to compensating individuals, the settlement also addresses the environmental impact caused by PFAS contamination. Private parties and government agencies have filed lawsuits against companies responsible for polluting water sources with PFAS chemicals. The settlement seeks to provide funds for the cleanup and remediation of affected areas, ensuring that the environment is restored to its original state.

Furthermore, the settlements may include provisions for medical monitoring of individuals exposed to PFAS, as these chemicals have been linked to various health problems, including increased blood pressure and other potential long-term effects.

Lastly, the settlement also emphasizes the importance of consumer protection laws, as it addresses allegations of false advertising and inadequate disclosure of PFAS content in products.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does a PFAS lawsuit typically take to reach a settlement or go to trial?

The duration of a PFAS lawsuit before reaching a settlement or going to trial varies depending on the specific circumstances of the case, such as the complexity of the legal issues involved and the parties’ willingness to negotiate.

Can individuals affected by PFAS contamination file a lawsuit on their own, or do they need to join a larger class-action lawsuit?

Individuals affected by PFAS contamination can file a lawsuit on their own or join a larger class-action lawsuit. The decision depends on the circumstances of the case and the preferences of the affected individuals.

Are there any limitations or caps on the amount of damages that can be awarded in a PFAS lawsuit?

There may be limitations or caps on the amount of damages that can be awarded in a PFAS lawsuit. These limitations are typically set by the relevant laws or regulations governing the lawsuit and vary depending on the jurisdiction.

What are some of the common challenges faced by plaintiffs in proving their allegations of PFAS contamination?

Common challenges faced by plaintiffs in proving their allegations of PFAS contamination include the need to establish a causal link between the defendant’s actions and the contamination, gathering sufficient scientific evidence, and overcoming potential defenses raised by the defendant.

Is it possible for a PFAS lawsuit to result in criminal charges against the responsible parties?

Yes, it is possible for a PFAS lawsuit to result in criminal charges against the responsible parties. Criminal charges may be brought if there is evidence of intentional or reckless misconduct in relation to PFAS contamination.


The PFAS case is a complex legal matter that involves various parties and poses significant challenges. Determining the extent of damages caused by PFAS exposure is complex, as it may involve assessing health impacts, property value loss, and environmental harm.

Settlements are often reached in PFAS lawsuits, where parties agree to resolve the dispute without going to trial. However, if a settlement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to trial, where a judge or jury will make a final decision on the matter. In either scenario, the outcome of a PFAS lawsuit can have significant implications for affected individuals and communities.

If you need experienced legal aid in PFAS litigation, our team of attorneys at Marin, Barrett, and Murphy Law Firm is ready to help. With experience in soil and water contaminant cases, we have the resources, capacity and aptitude to help you navigate the complexities of a PFAS lawsuit.